Did you like this site? Detest it? Let us know! (We will not add you to any mailing list) Click HERE

First, we must remember that neither creation or evolution are experimental science...why? Because both of them happened in the past.  They could be referred to as Historical Science.  There is a difference.

Experimental science involves discovering how things operate in today’s creation – cataloguing repeatable, observable phenomena in the present.

Historical science deals with the origin and circumstances of things in the past-unique, unrepeatable, unobservable events.

The difference between creation and evolution is interpretation of the evidence.  You may think this website will  provide a bunch of evidence for creation, then you will go to another site that gives a bunch of evidence for evolution and which ever one has more wins...right??  WRONG!

Both the creationist and evolutionist have the SAME evidence.  We just have different interpretations of the same evidence.

Look, we all have the same fossils, same sun-stars-moons, same dirt, same world, same trees...etc.  It is the interpretation that is different. 

What you must do is find out which theory best fits the evidence we see out there.

For instance we could look at the Grand Canyon.  The Evolutionist will say that the canyon was carved over millions of years by the Colorado river.  The Creationist will say the canyon was carved quickly with lots of water from the flood.  Which is right?  Well this will take some investigation.

The facts are these: The canyon is a gorge cut through the Kiabab upvalt.  Basically this would be like a wrinkle in a carpet when pushed together.  You have a hump in the earth with a canyon running through it. Now, evolutionists say that the canyon was carved by the river... but right away we see an contradiction with the theory and the evidence.  A river cannot run uphill to cut through the upvalt in the earth. 

The flood theory blends with the evidence we see.  The canyon is a breach in a dam.  What evidence supports this? Well, upriver of the canyon are shore lines of 2 huge lakes that spanned over 4 states.  They were named Grand and Hoppe lake.  This shows that the upvault blocked the water.  Then as levels began to rise water broke the natural dam and started pouring through.  So could a small amount of water cut down over millions of years from that lake...sure.... could the dam have breached and caused trillions of gallons to rush through carving out the canyon? Yes.  So what other evidence is out there? Lots. For instance when a small winding river cuts a canyon you will find a sedimentary mud deposit at the end called a delta.  However the Grand Canyon does not have one.  This would lead us to believe that all the mud from the canyon (lots) was washed down into the ocean.  This would say that it was LOTS of water ripping through the canyon to carry all that sediment away.

Not only that, but we see evidence at Mount St. Helens where 600 foot canyons were created within hours.  Today a little creek runs through the bottom looking as though the creek cut the canyon over years and years, but that is not what happened.

We see that Grand Canyon was formed by lots of water over little time which goes with the flood in Noah's day.

Lets take a look at some of the claims of evolution...

Here are some ideas of evolution:

1. Cosmic Evolution: This is the origin of time, space and matter.  Nobody has ever seen this, it cannot be reproduced in a lab, nor can it be tested (The definition of science is something that can be tested, demonstrated and observed) But there is a bigger problem.  Time, space and matter have to come into being at the same time.  If you have time and matter but no space...where would you put it?  If you had space and time but no matter...what would you put in it??  How can matter/energy create itself?

    The Holy Bible sums this up in the first ten words of the Bible.  "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." The word "beginning" is in reference to time.  The word "heaven" refers to space.  The word "earth" refers to matter.  And they all came into existence at the same time.

2. Chemical Evolution:  This is the origin of higher elements.  The big bang model states that only hydrogen and helium were present at the big bang.  Well where did the other 105 elements come from...how did they evolve?  The answer we are told is fusion... but wait... you CANNOT get past iron with fusion!!  They will say the stars form the elements and they will also say that the elements form the stars (gas clouds compressing making a star) Well now you have a chicken and egg problem... WHAT CAME FIRST the stars or the elements??
 

3. Stellar and Planetary Evolution: --This is the origin of stars and planets.  Astronomers have estimated there are over 11 trillion stars out there.  They also observe that about every 30 years a star "dies' and explodes into a nova or super-nova.  Astronomers state there are about 300 dead stars... well where are all the dead stars if they have been there for BILLIONS of years, there should be hundreds of thousands of them.  We NEVER see stars forming.  Some say we see a dot getting brighter must be a star forming... well it could be that a star is appearing from behind a dust cloud that is dissipating!

4. Organic Evolution: --This is the origin of life.  We never see life form spontaneously! Pasteur proved that wrong years and years ago.  Evolutionists are stuck in 100 year old science.  Think about it, in the "fossil record" you have the 'Cambrian explosion.'  This tells us that SUDDENLY there were complex life forms... hmmmm wonder why. They were created not evolved.

5. Macro-Evolution: --This is one thing changing into another over millions of years.  Never been observed!  In fact we have fossils supposedly 'millions' of years old that have no evidence of
evolving AT ALL!!! Like the Lobe-finned fish (Coelacanth) if you want more examples let me know.  I hear evolutionists say... it is because they are done evolving... but if you know the story: the lobe-finned fish was considered an INDEX fossil.  (Therefore used to date certain rock strata)  it was considered extinct at about 400 million years ago.  Until whoops! there were found alive and well today!

(Female swimming with Coelacanth (lobe-finned fish) fish supposedly went extinct over 400 million years ago but found alive today with NO evolutionary transition at all!)

The fossil record is much better explained by a world wide flood (in the days of Noah)  with the slowest moving and least intelligent beings buried first (it makes sense because clams can't run when they see a flood coming, and they are not smart enough to get to higher ground! But humans are. They will get to higher ground then try to get on a floating tree or log mat.  And what will happen to them... they will die and float on the water therefore DECOMPOSE leaving nothing to FOSSILIZE that same with birds... they will fly until they 'run out of gas' land on a log... die and decompose... is that why we don't find very many HUMAN fossils and very many bird fossils????  A world wide flood would easily explain all the HUGE fossil graveyards out there (Dinosaur National Park) Anyway, if the stratum formed slowly over millions of years, how are there so many fossils? It takes special circumstances to fossilize something and it DOES NOT take ten thousand years or more (Like I was taught in school).

             Petrified Hat                Petrified Pickle (Now THAT'S preserved)

 
 Petrified Cowboy boot made in the 1950's with Cowboy's leg still inside. Do they call this the 'Limestone Cowboy'?

6. Micro-Evolution: --This is changes within a kind of animal (Dogs: Great Dane, Poodle, Collie, Labrador Retriever)  Now we have something that IS observed, tested and demonstrated.  The top 5 groups are PURELY BELIEF and NOT SCIENCE. You MUST believe they happened... you have NO observation of them.  There are over 250 different species of dog,  Collie, Lab, etc.  There are BIG dogs and little dogs.  Though there are changes... or variations... they have LIMITS.  You will never breed a dog the size of Texas or a dog as little as a cockroach.  The DNA comes with specific information coded in it.  There are limits.  Evolutionists will teach this as evidence for change (which there is) then say, and "over millions of years one kind of animal became another!"  Now wait just a minute!  Now they left the realm of science and entered into a belief system like religion!

 If we look at the evolutionist way of thinking then there was a time long ago where there was no such thing as a lung.  No where in the universe was there information for a lung.  But the information to start a lung HAD to come from somewhere.  Information had to have been added to the Genome at SOME point to start the evolution of the lung.  Well, the only hope for the evolutionist is the genetic mutation.  Never have we seen information being ADDED to the Genome.  With mutations we have only seen a loss of information... we see a LOSS ALL THE TIME but that is NOT how evolution works... you can't keep having losses...pretty soon you will have nothing!!  Sickle-cell anemia is used all the time for evidence of a beneficial mutation (but it is a LOSS of info, a corrupt hemoglobin that the Malaria can't attach and live!!  How is this beneficial?? They say you can't get malaria... well isn't that the same as me telling someone who had their legs amputated that his amputation was beneficial because he can no longer get athlete's foot??

But people want to say there are beneficial mutations, and some look as though they may be beneficial (debated) so lets say they are.  I guess the fact would be that we have never seen or known of a mutation that ADDED new information to the Genome (which is what evolution NEEDS!!) Even if we have observed 'beneficial' mutations we have never seen enough to explain evolution. You would need billions of these mutations to get what evolution supposedly made.  No CHANCE.  Not only that, but each "beneficial" mutation is a LOSS of information NOT gain which AGAIN is what is NEEDED!!

NEXT:  The misinformation text books use as 'evidence' evolution.